Quit your complaining


A focus on critical thinking has fostered a society obsessed with negativity

Megan Chernak
The Cord (Wilfrid Laurier University)

WATERLOO, Ont. (CUP) –– If there is one thing that we can promote about university education, it’s the fact that we are taught to be “critical thinkers.”

In job interviews, discussions with concerned relatives and any other situation where we’re reduced to grasping at our defences, critical thinking manages to come up in one form or another.

However, next time you sit down with a group of people, stop to observe the topics of conversation. Who knew that critical thinking equals complaining? We are excellent at analyzing issues. It seems to be the common thread that binds us; simply watching a television program turns into a contest of who can spot the biggest flaw.

We are not willing to accept anything as it appears, or we will not accept any explanation except the most critical. An outrageous celebrity statement must be traceable to drugs and an unseasonably warm day is shrugged off to global warming. Political unrest in the Middle East? Figures.

We search for negativity, convincing ourselves that negative fates are deserved and anything uplifting must be temporary or a joke.

I am not advocating a life of ignorant, complaint-free bliss. We have strong convictions and we should voice our opinions. We live in a country that will not persecute us for raising our voices about issues, something that we should fully appreciate.

We can talk politics, gender equality and find humour in a child lobbying for “more cookies for kids” at the G8 summit last June. We idolize satirists and comedians who can call out the leading figures in the ridiculous spectacle we live in.

What I wish to call attention to is complaining for the sake of complaining. Perhaps social media aids it – we can instantly share our opinions in 140 characters or less to those following us through Twitter. We can post a link on Facebook of a ridiculous statement made by anyone from Charlie Sheen to Stephen Harper and then proceed to find fault in every aspect of their being.

We have no problem anonymously posting accusatory statements on online discussion boards, which may turn out to be the perfect medium for our generation. An argument posted without an author to blame, just another criticism offered by a faceless, untraceable voice that others can feed off of. We want our opinions to be heard and if others cannot trace it back to us, we have the freedom to be increasingly harsh.

Internet posts are read, dismissed and replaced so quickly that there isn’t enough time to evaluate arguments made before they are replaced with haphazardly formed responses.

I see the problem resting in research and accountability. We can make statements in the seconds it takes to type or text message a few words, without considering the full background story. We easily dismiss information as characteristic of an individual’s usual behaviour.

In psychology it is known as the fundamental attribution error: We tear people apart, because any hardness that has befallen them must be due to individual factors and not environmental or background causes.

In today’s society, critical thinking is an invaluable tool. Without it we would be swallowed by the barrage of conflicting messages we receive every day. Complain all you want, but validate your arguments and treat each post as representative.

Comments are closed.